My comments on a roundtable organized by Andy Hom at ISA 2014, entitled “A Bridge Too Far? Caution in Theory Along the Border of the Academy.” The topic here is the relationship of scholarship and policy work, so to speak. Shortly before making these comments, I tweeted: “Francois Debrix stealing my Weberian thunder at #isa2014 roundtable on ‘scholarly caution.’ Guess I have to think of something else to say.” You will have to judge for yourself whether I succeeded.
The q and a that followed my talk on Max Weber’s methodology at the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs (NUPI), which is archived here.
Here’s a talk I gave at the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs (NUPI) on 25 May. Topic: Weberian methodology.
Here’s the talk I delivered yesterday at the Watson Institute for International Studies at Brown University. This is a remix of the civilizations talk I have previously given at GW and Rutgers; this version/performance is more about the configuration of social-scientific disciplinary knowledge than previous versions was, because that’s where my brain is at the moment.
TagsAACP 2009 American University autism civilizations C of I constructivism explanation international theory IR IR theory ISA legitimation methodology philosophy of science political theory pop culture relational theory science fiction social-scientific knowledge social science University College US foreign policy Weber Western Civilization zombies